From the previous post, We had a good discussion about where and how we pursuit creativity from Life or self-consciousness as pivotal source. Thanks to Will and Manny, I thought the friendly arguments between them about narrative and non-narrative art form can be stretched out further, so I writing this post. also, I'd like to discuss specifically under realm of ANIMATION/FILM.
Narrative and non-narrative seems to be pretty big thing even in CalArts (California Institute of Arts) where has Character Animation program and Experimental Animation program. Maybe that could be only my assumption but I mostly have seen lots of great narrative animation films from Character Animation students and Experimental Animation students have produced beautiful non-narrative films. I understand it is a stupid thing to judge which form is 'better' or 'valuable' although the film is meant to be something very specific.
Narrative form of film is informative, easily understandable and relatable to audiences, which offers certain methods to provoke certain emotion, reaction or messages. I can't easily say non-narrative films can't do any of those. Maybe they are even more powerful to create pure emotions and reactions, even messages. here is an example of great experimental animation that is not narrative but certainly expressive in its way.
the first video is the animated visualization of various 'taste' from Ratatouille. I am sure most people would recognize if you watched 'Ratatouille, Pixar' Both of them are done by Michel Gagne. Both of animation definitely visualizes the certain music or emotion and they work in their way. especially the end of 'GOT IT!' animation piece is so powerful as it just dies into muddy color of bubbles. IT certainly has ups and downs like like narrative films and emotional in its way. I am keep saying oh, both can to this stuff that stuff and i know i sound very pluralism. but yes, here are the questions.
What are distinctive direction of purposes or functions in narrative and non-narrative film/ animated films?
Beyond a question of which form of film is suitable for a specific subject matter or applications, How differently do they approach to audiences?
PS- I am seriously concerned about my grammars now.